beta
(영문) 부산지방법원 2015.04.16 2015고단363

축산물위생관리법위반

Text

Defendant

A In 8 months of imprisonment, 5 million won of fine for corporation C, 1 million won of defendant B, and 1 million won of fine for each.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A

(a) No one shall mark falsely, advertise or package in an exaggerated manner with respect to the names, manufacturing methods, ingredients, dietitians, quality of livestock products and their packaging;

On May 1, 2014, the Defendant: (a) in the warehouse of the Busan Young-gu, Busan Young-do, the F.A. F. F. F. F. F. F. F. F. F. F., which was attached to 153 boxes (20kg, total number of 3,060kgs per gambling house) purchased from the L.S., the Defendant removed all of the labels [the name of the United States: 20k, weight, identification number: 83400300302125, 20025: May 19, 2014; (b) the distribution period: (a) the date of June 1, 2014; (b) the manufacturing cost: (c) the freezing 032-575-822; (d) the storage method; (c) the freezing and permission number: 3500-104-208, respectively; and (d) the same year.

6.1. Among them, the term of circulation was extended by attaching a label (PRDUT (S) in English voluntarily produced in 25 25 stuffs (A. 500 km), 20.00 KG, PACEGIN: 09/06/2014, ESCRD 08/06/2016: EXD DETE: 08/2016.

(b) No livestock products, the distribution deadline of which expires, and part of the relevant livestock products, shall be sold, nor treated, processed, packaged, used, imported, stored, transported, or displayed for sale;

On June 5, 2014, the Defendant attached a new label among 153 boxes of 153 boxes with the removal of the labels as above at the place indicated in the paragraph (a) and sold 25 marbs with the expiration of 4 days of circulation period to D.

(c) Any label of livestock products for the purpose of selling unregistered livestock products shall be affixed with a label meeting the standards, and no label shall be sold, or processed, packaged, stored, transported or displayed for the purpose of sale without such label;

On May 23, 2014, the Defendant removed 153 Gabs 153 Gabs as above at the place indicated in the paragraph (Ga) of the same month and did not put 35 Gabs (700 g) at G business entities on the 27th of the same month and 43 Gabs (860 g) at H on the 27th of the same month.