A. Of attached Form 2. The Defendants’ “heir” in attached Tables 1, 2, and 3 are indicated in attached Table 2. C.

A. The indication of the claim is a clan that made the F 25 years old G members of the F 25 years old group, and the land indicated in the paragraph (a) of the Disposition 1 was each nominal trust with the defendant B, K, and L, which are the grounds of the clan, with H, I, and J.

After that, H et al., the title trustee, died as indicated in the column for “the decedent” in the attached Form 2, and the Defendants, as indicated in the “heir”, inherited each of the shares indicated in the “land shares” column.

The Plaintiff terminated the title trust through the service of the duplicate of the instant complaint. As such, the Defendants are obligated to implement the registration procedure for ownership transfer on the ground of termination of the title trust on the date of the final delivery of the duplicate of the instant complaint.

B. Article 208(3)3 and Article 194(2) of the Civil Procedure Act (amended by Service by Public Notice) of the rest of the Defendants under Articles 208(3)2 and 150(3) of the Civil Procedure Act (amended by Act No. 1)

2. In full view of the respective descriptions and arguments of the evidence No. 1 to No. 4 and No. 6-3 as to Defendant E, the facts identical to the description of the claim No. 1 can be acknowledged.

Defendant E owned the land set forth in Section 1-A of the Disposition, which was owned by the network I, and it is its inheritor, and thus, it is the owner of the above land. However, there is no evidence to acknowledge this. Thus, Defendant E’s above assertion is without merit.

Therefore, DefendantO is obligated to implement the registration procedure for ownership transfer on the ground of termination of title trust, such as the entry in Section 1(a) of the Disposition.

3. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case is justified and it is so decided as per Disposition.