A Imprisonment with prison labor for six months and fines for 5,000,000 won, and Defendant B shall be punished by fines for 5,000,000 won, respectively.

The Defendants are the defendants.

Defendant

A is the owner of “D” business in Suwon-si C4, Suwon-si, and Defendant B was an employee from July 23, 2018 to July 27, 2018.

From July 23, 2018 to July 27, 2018, Defendants conspired to engage in the conduct of arranging sexual traffic by allowing the said male to have sexual intercourse with the female employees, from July 19, 2018 to July 22, 2018, and from July 28, 2018 to August 27, 2018.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each police statement of E and F;

1. Publicity materials and field photographs;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on seizure records and list of seizure;

1. Article 19 (2) 1 and Article 24 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, Article 30 of the Criminal Act, and Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, and concurrently with imprisonment and fine: Defendant B: Selection of fines, Article 30 of the Criminal Act, Article 30 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic,

1. Defendants in the custody of a workhouse: Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act

1. Defendant A who is under the suspension of execution: Article 62 (1) and (2) of the Criminal Act (limited to imprisonment);

1. Defendant A: Article 25 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic;

1. Defendants of the provisional payment order: (a) under the grounds for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, the sentencing conditions specified in the trial process of the instant case, including the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, family relation, family relationship, home environment, motive and means of the crime, and circumstances after the crime, shall be determined as ordered.

The favorable circumstances: Defendant A is a primary offender; Defendant B has no record of being punished for the same crime; Defendant A is relatively short of the period of arranging sexual traffic; Defendant A is an operator of the instant sexual traffic business establishment; and Defendant A arranges sexual traffic by advertising the Internet site.