The lower court acquitted the Defendant on the charges of this case on the grounds stated in its reasoning, deeming that there was no proof of crime.

The judgment below

Examining the reasoning in light of the relevant legal principles and records, the lower court did not err in its judgment by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence against logical and empirical rules, by misapprehending the legal doctrine on the establishment of occupational embezzlement, or by violating the principle of court-oriented

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.