매매대금
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
1. Basic facts
A. The relationship between the parties and the defendant are those born between the deceased C (Death on February 2, 2012) and the deceased D (Death on May 23, 2015). The defendant is one male and female, and the plaintiff is the bottom of the deceased.
B. The Plaintiff and the Defendant drafted a sales contract as of December 3, 2012, with respect to each real estate (hereinafter “each of the instant real estate”) on which the Plaintiff acquired by gift from the deceased C, as indicated below, the sales contract (hereinafter “instant sales contract”) was prepared as of December 3, 2012.
① The seller: (3) The seller: (4) The transfer of ownership is the same as the receipt of any balance, and the date of delivery of real estate is December 24, 2012. < Amended by Act No. 11374, Dec. 24, 2012>
(5) The balance date may be postponed for two months depending on the purchaser's circumstances.
C. The Defendant, upon receipt of the transfer registration, completed the registration of transfer of ownership in the name of the Defendant on December 24, 2012 as to each of the instant real estate by the Gwangju District Court Youngdong Registry No. 16019.
[Ground for Recognition: Unsatisfy, Gap 1, 2 evidence, Eul 1 evidence (including each number; hereinafter the same shall apply)
(2) Each entry and the purport of the whole pleading
2. Determination:
A. The Plaintiff’s assertion 1) The Plaintiff and the Defendant drafted the instant sales contract, and the Plaintiff donated each real estate listed in paragraphs 4 and 5 of the attached Table to the Defendant, and agreed to sell each real estate listed in paragraphs 1 through 3 of the attached Table with the purchase price set at KRW 53 million. As such, the Defendant is obligated to pay the said purchase price to the Plaintiff. 2) The Defendant’s assertion that the instant sales contract was made only for the purpose of filing a report with the Mine-gun Office due to tax issues, and in fact, the Plaintiff donated each of the instant real estate without compensation in return for the Plaintiff’s nursing of the mother to the Defendant.