beta
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2018.10.11 2017고단3895

사서명위조등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Of the facts charged in this case, the driving of self-driving on August 12, 2017 is not guilty.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On December 5, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of 2 years in the Seoul Northern District Court for fraud; 2 years in the imprisonment of 6 months; and on April 3, 2015, on April 11, 2015, which was sentenced to six months in the Seoul Northern District Court for fraud, and the said suspended sentence became effective upon the final judgment on April 11, 2015; and on July 18, 2016, the execution of the final sentence was completed in the Ansan Prison. < Amended by Act No. 14377, Jul. 18, 2016>

"2017 Highest 3895"

1. On July 22, 2017, the Defendant violated the Resident Registration Act: (a) 04:09, the Defendant illegally used another person’s resident registration number by means of referring to the control police officer’s resident registration number (G) of a pro-friendly F entering a usual meeting without justifiable grounds, which was controlled by drinking in front of the Seoul Western-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, B, and by a slope, who was demanded to present an identification card from the Seoul Central Library Police Station C D and a slope.

2. The Defendant, at the time, at the time, at the place specified in paragraph (1) and at the same time, as stated in paragraph (1), was committed as if the Defendant was the pro-friendly F of the Defendant who was under the control of driving alcohol by the control police officer, and had the control police officer enter the F’s personal information and the details of the violation, etc. in the traffic computer network in PDA, and forged F’s signature by means of electronic signature in the column for the driver’s signature signature of the said PDA, and at the same time, signed the F’s signature in the column for the signature of the driver who was demanded from the control police officer to sign the report on the situation of the driver’s statement stating the F’s personal information and the circumstances of drinking driving.

Accordingly, the defendant puts his signature on the above F's signature without authority for the purpose of exercising his right.

3. The Defendant, at the time, at the place specified in paragraph 1, presented the forged signature of F, as described in paragraph 2, to the police officer in charge of the above crackdown, who was aware of the forgery without authority, as if he were his own signature.

4. On July 22, 2017, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (drinking) in front of the Seoul Jung-gu, Seoul around 04:09.