On January 19, 2020, the Defendant: (a) was able to see the door on the ground that the Defendant’s wife, who frightened and frighted from drinking in the ward located in the apartment house located in the same subparagraph of the apartment house, went home to a small room where the Defendant’s wife, who frighted to fright at her husband’s fright and left home, was able to sing down the door on the ground that the door was frighted and broken down; (b) the victim’s bumke on the ground that she was unable to fright, and the victim was frighted on two occasions at the floor; (c) the chest part of the chest was frighted up to the floor; and (d) the victim was frighted into the Defendant, and c was frighted into his hair and frighted into the Defendant, and the victim was frightd on three occasions, and the victim was frighted into the victim’s chest, and d on three occasions.

Accordingly, the defendant assaulted victims.

2. The facts charged in the instant case are the crimes falling under Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act, which cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under Article 260(3) of the Criminal Act.

According to the records and arguments, the victims can recognize the fact that they have withdrawn their wish to punish the defendant after instituting the prosecution of this case. Thus, the prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.