When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The defendant is a person engaged in driving a motor vehicle by borrowing B.

The driver of any motor vehicle shall be prohibited from driving his/her motor vehicle repeatedly committing any violation of speed or prohibition of change of course, any violation of signal or instruction, any median line, any violation of speed prohibition, any violation of speed prohibition, any overtaking method, any violation of overtaking methods, etc. as prescribed by the Road Traffic Act and subordinate statutes, or posing any threat or danger to other persons or causing any danger to traffic continuously or repeatedly.

Nevertheless, around 07:15 on December 27, 2019, the Defendant continued to operate the said franchise in the vicinity of the route between Busan and the Jinju, and passed along the two-lanes in the direction of Jinju in the direction of Jinju, the Defendant violated the method of changing the course from the two-lanes to the one-lane one-lane one, on the ground that the informed vehicle driving in the direction of the same direction has turned into the one-lane one-lane one, while driving in the direction of Jinju, the Defendant continued to violate the method of changing the course from the two-lanes to the one-lane one-lane one-lane one, and continued to drive a scambling vehicle, such as violation of the Road Traffic Act by changing the course from the two-lanes to the one-lane one-lane one-lane one-lane one-lane one-lane one-lane one-lane one-lane one-lane one-lane one-way one-way one-way one-way one.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. smart information documents;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes of the hostile inquiry;

1. Relevant legal provisions and the choice of punishment for the crime under Article 151-2 and subparagraph 5 of Article 46-3 of the Road Traffic Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The crime of this case on the grounds of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order is a crime of extremely dangerous nature, such as the so-called knife, on the grounds that other vehicles have changed in their own future, and thus, the crime of this case is a crime resulting from large traffic accidents, and the defendant does not have the previous one, but is two times.