However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

The defendant is a person engaged in C Bus driving service.

On February 13, 2018, the Defendant driven the above bus on the front of the business building D in Southern-gu, Southern-gu, Seoul Metropolitan City on February 13, 2018, and continued to run a speed of about 50km from the border of the west-gu to the high speed bus terminal in the direction of the west-gu.

At the same time, there is a pedestrian crossing which does not have a pedestrian signal at the front door, so in such a case, there was a duty of care to check whether a person engaged in driving a motor vehicle has a duty of care to safely drive the motor vehicle by reducing speed and checking well the right and the right of the motor vehicle driver.

However, the Defendant neglected this and found the victim E (the age of 45) who was a frighter of the Madern crosswalk at a late time, and operated the frighter to avoid this, but the Defendant was not faced with the frighter part of the frighter's bus driver's frighter's frighter, and had the victim go beyond the ground.

Accordingly, the Defendant’s negligence caused the death of the victim by external shocks caused by the head’s blood damage at a university of one country and at a university affiliated hospital affiliated with the university of one country, which is located in 201 in the south-dong-gu, South-gu, East-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City on February 13, 2018.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A traffic accident report;

1. Report on the occurrence of a traffic accident;

1. An investigation report (Attachment of a photograph of a screen stuffe image data to the upper part of the screen);

1. A report on investigation (a bus-related analysis data shall be attached);

1. A death certificate;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on site photographs;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning facts constituting an offense, Article 3 (1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents Aggravated Punishment, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (the conditions favorable to the following reasons for sentencing)

1. The scope of recommended sentences according to the sentencing guidelines [the types of decisions] ordinary traffic accidents, the type 2 (person subject to special mitigation] punishment not (the scope of recommended sentences) shall be mitigated;