A shall be punished by a fine for negligence of KRW 2,000,000, and by a fine of KRW 4,000,000.

The Defendants respectively.

1. On November 16, 2013, Defendant B and the Defendants conspired to commit a similar sexual intercourse in collusion with Defendant B, which was operated by Defendant B on the 2nd floor of around 21:00, around around 21:00, and around 21:0, Defendant B, as the owner of the business, had the owner of the business, and Defendant A, as an employee, had 10,000 won of his son’s sexual organ, and had his employee E engage in a similar sexual intercourse in a manner that leads to an employee E to scambling the sexual organ of the said customer.

As a result, Defendants conspired to arrange sexual traffic for business purposes.

2. Defendant E committed a similar sexual intercourse in such a manner that he received KRW 110,00 from his son’s son, who found his son at the above time and place, and was able to see the sexual organ of the said guest by taking the son’s hand.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant B’s legal statement

1. The defendant A's partial statement

1. Protocol concerning the interrogation of suspects of E by the prosecution;

1. A protocol concerning the police investigation of the defendant A;

1. Each written statement of E and Defendant A;

1. Records of seizure and the list of seizure;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, Etc., and Article 30 of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The defendant A, guilty of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, asserts that he was unaware of the fact that he arranged sexual traffic such as the defendant B's criminal facts, and that he did not conspired with the defendant B.

On November 22, 2013, the following circumstances acknowledged by each of the above evidence, namely, Defendant A served as a customer guidance at the time when it was controlled by the police, and the instant business establishment has several CCTVs and Malamers to prevent control, and the said Defendant received KRW 110,000 won from customers in light of the fact that the said Defendant received the cost of marinas including the cost of sexual traffic.