폭행
The judgment of the court below is reversed.
The defendant shall be innocent.
1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (misunderstanding of facts) has no record of assaulting the victim by walking his/her mouth.
2. Determination
A. On March 10, 2016, the Defendant: (a) around March 10, 2016, the Defendant had the victim E, a house owner residing on the third floor of the said house, frequently obstructed the change of the Seoul Jongno-gu D and the first floor house; and (b) had the victim E, a house owner residing on the third floor of the said house repair the irregular repair machine.
The above repairer collected garbage, such as a biochemical, water dust, and balle, by drilling a hacker, and collected garbage, and the police officer who reported 112 surrounding the cause of the breakdown between the defendant's family and the defendant's family, caused a dispute accompanied by a severe bath to the extent that the police officer who reported 112 caused the breakdown between the defendant's family and the defendant's family, and the repairer did not remove the above garbage, etc. collected from the change
피고인은 같은 날 22:30 경 피해 자가 피고인 가족 편을 들지 않고 수리업자 입장을 두둔한 것으로 생각하고 화가 나 수리업자가 놓고 간 위 오물들을 비닐에 담아 피해자 집으로 찾아 가게 되었고, 피해자가 현관문을 열어 주자 마자 위 비닐에 싸 가지고 갔던 위 오물들을 현관문 바로 앞 바닥에 내려놓고 발로 짓밟아 차서 그 곳 신발장 주변과 열려 져 있던 중문 안으로 오물이 떨어지게 하면서 독일어로 “ 싸 이세” 라는 치욕적인 욕설을 함과 동시에 오른발로 피해자의 왼쪽 정강이를 걷어찼다.
Accordingly, the defendant assaulted the victim.
B. The lower court found the Defendant guilty of the instant facts charged based on the victim’s statement and F’s statement.
(c)
(1) Considering the following circumstances known in the records of this case, it is difficult to believe the victim’s statement.
◎ 피해자가 피고 인의 폭행으로 입은 상처 라며 제출한 상처 부위 사진에 나타난 상처의 모양을 보면, 신발에 걷어차여 생긴 상처 라기 보다는 가늘고 날카로운 물체에 긁힌 상처라고 생각된다.
◎ 피해자는...