beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 2016.08.12 2015노5791

사기

Text

The judgment of the court below is reversed.

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the above punishment for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

1. Facts charged;

A. On March 2010, the Defendant, at the Seocho-gu Seoul Seocho-gu Office 303 Office, operated by the Defendant on March 3, 2010, set up an apartment building with the victim D’s international sexuality, such as Chinese language, and can be punished by a large amount of money if Korean investors are recruited and sold.

If profits accrue, sufficient compensation shall be given.

The phrase “the phrase was false.”

However, at the time, the defendant did not participate in the Chinese apartment construction project, and was liable for the debt of 60 million won, and there was no intention or ability to repay the principal and interest to the victim due to no particular property or revenue, and was thought to use the money as the repayment of the loan and the cost of living.

The defendant deceivings the victim as above and received 1.5 million won from the victim to his account in the name of the defendant on May 25, 2010 and deposited 12,350,000 won through seven times as shown in the list of crimes in the attached Form. < Amended by Presidential Decree No. 2212, Jan. 1 through 7, 2010>

B. On September 201, 2010, the Defendant: (a) at the place specified in the preceding paragraph at the end of the end of the day, collected money from the said victim to the customer; and (b) there is insufficient expenses.

On January 25, 2011, when receiving a contract advance payment in China, it is intended to pay all the borrowed money and pay a full compensation.

“The phrase “ was false.”

However, at the time, the defendant did not plan to receive advance payments in China, and did not have any property or revenue, and did not have any intention or ability to repay the borrowed money to the victim, and was thought to use the borrowed money as the repayment of the borrowed money and the cost of living.

Defendant deceiving the victim as above and received KRW 50,000 from the victim on September 15, 2010 to the account in the name of the Defendant, and deposited KRW 10,240,000 over 20 times as shown in the List of Crimes Nos. 8 through 27.

(c)

On March 2012, the Defendant: (a) at the place under the preceding paragraph at the end of March, 2012, “in China, like a punishment.”