The defendant is serving as an agent in charge of origin labeling in the company D, which is located in the Chungcheongbuk-gun C.

No person who sells or provides agricultural and fishery products or the processed products thereof after cooking shall place a false indication of the place of origin or place a mark likely to cause confusion therewith.

Nevertheless, from May 2013 to July 2013, the Defendant: (a) sold and sold roasting roassing roassing roassing roassing roassing roassing in China in China in the above Co., Ltd. D; and (b) around that time, the prosecutor of KRW 4,541,80 stated that “4,541,800 won” was “4,541,800,000 won” in the written application for permission to modify the indictment; (c) however, it is obvious that the record is a simple clerical error of “4,541,

A significant amount of roasting foods were sold.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Partial statement of witness E;

1. A statement of detection;

1. Business registration certificate or certified transcript of register;

1. roasting places where indication of origin is marked, reports on the manufacture of items roasting places, details on the purchase of roasting places, details on the sale of roasting places, and direction for roasting places to rest;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing exposed evidence photographs;

1. Relevant Articles 15 and 6 (2) 1 of the Act on Origin Labeling of Agricultural and Fishery Products and the Selection of Punishment for Criminal Facts;

1. A fine not exceeding 300,000 won to be suspended;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act (100,000 won per day);

1. Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act of the suspended sentence (see, e.g., Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2007Do1488, Apr. 2, 2007) (1))