However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

From June 27, 2014 to October 2015, the Defendant was in office as a chief inspector of the Buddhist Cho Jong-sung who belongs to the Buddhist inspection team from June 27, 2014 to the end of October, 2015, and the victim D was in office as a chief inspector of the inspection team from the Cho Jong-sung to the appointment of the chief inspector of the C inspection.

1. On October 29, 2015, the Defendant: (a) at the C Inspection Station located in Sinyoung-si, 22:50 on October 29, 2015, the Defendant found that D was dissatisfied with the fact that D would be appointed as the chief inspector of the inspection; (b) caused her obsesses, such as E, E, E, E, E, E, and E, and caused her obs, Tues, Twin, E, E, E, and destroyed by a tree so that the size of the visit amounting to approximately KRW 100,000,00 is unknown.

2. A special intimidation: (a) the Defendant, at the same time and place as above 1.1. paragraph, 30 centimeters of the excessive (30cm) of a deadly weapon was destroyed by a prior visit, and then threatened the said victim D (53 Does) with the victim’s “Abreg, Ein, Ein, Ein, Ein, Ein, Ein, Ein, Ein, Ein, Ein, Ein, Ein, Ein, Ein, Ein, Ein, Ein, Ein, Ma, and Earra from this hour,” etc. on the part of the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of the witness D;

1. Part of the statement made to the defendant in the protocol of interrogation of the suspect;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of suspects of D;

1. Police seizure records and list of seizure;

1. Recording notes;

1. The defendant asserts that a criminal investigation report (in relation to the site dispatch situation and seizure of evidence), investigation report (in relation to the submission of a recording record), recording document (in relation thereto, the defendant takes a bath with the victim D at the time, took a physical fighting with the victim D, but did not put a threat to the victim.

The victim who made a statement from the investigative agency to the court without exaggeration about the background of intimidation and the shape of the knife cited at the time.