If the defendant does not pay the above fine, he shall be 100.

On November 5, 2016, around 20:10, the Defendant driven the Defendant’s E-wing and 3 Ban ray while under the influence of alcohol concentration of about 0.163% in blood from a distance of about 30 meters to the front of the Defendant’s dwelling in Ansan-si, A-si.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A written statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to notify the results of drinking test, the history of drinking influence, and the results of drinking control;

1. Article 148-2, Article 148-2, Article 44 (2) 2, and Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act (Selection of penalty) concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The grounds for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, including the Defendant’s age, sex, environment, background leading up to the instant crime, means and result thereof, circumstances after the instant crime, the number of similar cases, and other various conditions of sentencing as shown in the pleadings of the instant case, shall be taken into account, in particular, the following circumstances: (a) the Defendant led to the instant crime; and (b) the fact that the Defendant has committed a mistake; and (c) there was no record of criminal punishment due to drinking alcohol driving for the last ten years.