채무부존재확인
1.(a)
On June 2, 2013, with respect to the defendant (Counterclaim plaintiff) of the plaintiff (Counterclaim defendant), the plaintiff (Counterclaim plaintiff) is front of the petition-gu C Apartment at the Cheongju-si around 20:10.
The principal lawsuit and counterclaim shall also be deemed to have been filed.
1. Basic facts
A. The Plaintiff is a corporation with the purpose of carrying on the transportation business of taxi passengers as the owner of a taxi for D business use (hereinafter “instant cab”), while E is an employee of the Plaintiff.
B. At around 20:10 on June 2, 2013, E, driving the instant Maritime Vehicle, and driving the front of the C Apartment-gu Seoul Apartment-ro, Cheongju-si, along the two-lanes from the sloping to the Si consul-distance, facing the Defendant’s right bridge crossinging the said road to the front part of the Maritime Vehicle.
(hereinafter referred to as the “instant accident”). On the other hand, a crosswalk was installed at the front of about 30 meters from the point of the instant accident at which the said accident occurred.
C. On June 3, 2013, the Defendant: (a) was admitted to the Cheongju-Mamo Hospital; (b) was diagnosed on June 3, 2013, by the instant accident; (c) was transferred to the F Hospital on June 5, 2013.
On June 7, 2013, the Defendant transferred the aforementioned injury from the Defendant’s Intervenor, who was a doctor, to the Cheongju University Hospital, showing symptoms, such as the decline in blood pressure, while undergoing an operation, such as salvating and salvating sallle, etc. (hereinafter “the instant operation”). Around that time, the Defendant was diagnosed as a successful heart suspension of pulmonary typology, typosis, and cardiopulmonary typosis, and was hospitalized in the Cheongju University Hospital and the Cheongju Hospital.
E. On January 6, 2014, the medical doctor G of the Chungcheongnam-do Hospital (hereinafter “the instant physical appraisal”) conducted a physical appraisal against the Defendant on the part of January 6, 2014. The Defendant’s injury to brain is likely to be unable to take action and move for daily life due to the decline in awareness due to the damage of low oxygen brain and the lack of voluntary movement due to the climatic dynasium.