beta
(영문) 부산지방법원 서부지원 2020.06.19 2018고단1976 (1)

폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(공동상해)

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On March 28, 2018, at around 22:40, the Defendant, in front of the Gupodong-gu, Busan, 82, when he/she had a verbal dispute with the victim B, took a part of the victim's face with drinking, and C, in combination with this, she walked the victim's face one time to walk the victim's face to the floor, she turns the victim's face into the floor, and her drinking and sprinked the victim's face, and she took part in the part of the victim's face and the bridge.

As a result, the defendant and C jointly put the victim into a medical room where the number of days of treatment can not be known.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness B and D;

1. On-site and in-depth photographs (the defendant and his defense counsel asserts that there was no assault against the victim B as stated in the criminal facts in the judgment of the defendant. However, this court asserts that the following facts and circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly examined by this court, namely, the victim B, from investigation agency to investigation agency to this court, consistently stated to the effect that the victim abused the victim as stated in the criminal facts in the judgment of the defendant, and also corresponds to the above statement of the victim as stated in the criminal facts in the judgment of the defendant, as stated in the judgment of the defendant, (2) it is consistent with the statement of the victim as stated in the judgment of the defendant, and (3) it is inconsistent with the statement between the defendant and the victim as to the circumstances in which the defendant and the victim have raised a dispute over the victim. However, according to the statement of the defendant C, the fact that C was frightbling with each other before the victim and the victim was frighted with the victim, and (4) the victim stated in the investigative agency that he want to be subject to punishment of the defendant, instead of the victim's testimony.