However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On January 5, 2015, at around 23:20 on January 5, 2015, the Defendant: (a) expressed in the “C subdivision type” located in B, on the following occasions: (b) expressed that the Defendant: (c) had the victim D (60 cm) from the victim of the beer; and (c) had the victim’s face taken three times via the victim’s telegraph by drinking it on two occasions; (d) had the victim’s face taken three times.

As a result, the Defendant inflicted an injury upon the victim during the period of 14 days, which requires treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to damaged photographs and written diagnosis of injury;

1. Relevant Article 257 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the choice of punishment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the Suspension of Execution (the sentence shall be determined as per the order within the scope of the sentencing guidelines (the area of mitigation: two months to one year), taking into account all circumstances, such as the fact that the defendant is against the defendant and that the defendant has agreed with the victim: Provided, That the defendant has a criminal record of multiple violent fines, etc.);