1. Around April 5, 2017, Defendant 2017, Defendant 1357, obstructed the path due to the victim D (40 years old) who is working to load a truck on the street in the front of Dongdaemun-gu Seoul, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul, for a lower-ranking operation of the truck.

Madsan who has been in possession of satis, has become a part of the victim's face.

2. At around 20:00 on June 8, 2017, Defendant 2509, “G main points” operated by the Victim F located in Dongdaemun-gu Seoul, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul, hereinafter referred to as “chch, bitch bitch bitch.”

“A defendant was in his possession for the purpose of calculating the drinking value while continuing to take a bath.”

100,000 won check was exchanged for cash through customers who had been in the place, but did not receive it. “Does the tax base of 100,000 won check, and the tax base of the tax base of the tax base of the tax base of the tax base of the tax base of

The victim interfered with the business of the restaurant of the victim by force by avoiding disturbance for about one hour, such as referring to a large voice, etc.

Summary of Evidence

[2017 Highest 1357]

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning suspect examination of D (2017 high-ranking 2509)

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on investigation (or H telephone call for a witness);

1. Relevant Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor for the crime;

1. Criteria for sentencing reasons for sentencing under the former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Article 38 (1) 2, and Article 50 of the same Act, as the punishment for concurrent crimes;

(a) Crimes 1 (Obstruction of Duties) (Scope of Recommendation) and obstruction of duties; Type 1 (Obstruction of Duties) (Interference with 6 months to 1 June);

B. The scope of the final sentence according to the aggravation of multiple crimes where the degree of assault is minor (type 1, 6, and 7) in the mitigated area of Category 1 (No. 1 to 8) (a person with a special mitigation) (type 1, 6, and 7) (a person with a special mitigation): The sentence identical to the order shall be determined by comprehensively taking into account the conditions of the sentencing indicated in the records, such as the circumstances under which the sentence was rendered in June to October 1, and the defendant’s age, occupation, sex, family relationship, and circumstances before and after the commission of the crime.

- April 21, 2016