특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주차량)등
All appeals by the defendant and the prosecutor are dismissed.
1. The defendant asserts that the defendant's punishment of the court below (one year of imprisonment) with respect to the summary of the grounds for appeal is too unfasible, and the prosecutor is too unfased and unfair.
2. The alcohol content among the blood of this case is considerably high as 0.157%, and the victim was injured by the accident in the accident in this case, and the physical damage amount is considerably high.
Nevertheless, it is practically difficult to compensate for damage because the vehicle operated by the defendant is covered by liability insurance, and there is no circumstance that the defendant has made efforts to recover damage to the victim, and the defendant has already been punished three times due to drinking driving.
However, in full view of all kinds of sentencing conditions on the records, including the fact that the defendant recognized the facts charged and reflects on the defendant's age, sex, environment, occupation, and circumstances after the crime, the sentence imposed by the court below is judged to be appropriate, and it is not recognized that the sentence imposed by the defendant is too heavy or unreasonable.
3. The appeal filed by the defendant and the prosecutor is without merit. Thus, all of the appeals are dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.