A. With regard to the violation of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act (the use of dangerous weathers), the court below found the Defendant guilty of this part of the facts charged on the ground of witness G who did not have any fact that the Defendant added waste to a waste processing unit, and found the Defendant guilty of this part of the facts charged on the ground of the witness G's statement, etc. In relation to the violation of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act (the state cancellation column of government offices), the Defendant did not spit or spit the horses that the police officer passed or spit as stated in the facts charged, and on the other hand, it was merely a spit or spit on the ground that the police officer took a spit or spits down on the ground that the police officer was forcibly

B. The sentence imposed by the court below on the grounds of unreasonable sentencing (the fine of 500,000 won) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. (1) The court below found the witness G to be guilty of this part of the facts charged on the ground that the witness G's statement, etc. corresponds to the facts charged in this part of the defendant's violation of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act (the use of dangerous weather) was reliable. The court below found the witness G to be guilty of this part of the facts charged on the ground that the court below found the witness G's statement, etc. based on the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the court below, i.e., the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the court below, i.e., the witness G made a detailed statement at the investigative agency about the reason why the closure was unsatis in the official market, the situation at the time when the witness's witness's testimony cannot be known in a specific and direct manner, and otherwise the witness's testimony cannot be found to have any motive or reason to find a false statement to find the defendant without any specific and direct experience, the judgment of the court below is just and it is not erroneous in the

(ii).