마약류관리에관한법률위반(향정)
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is that the punishment prescribed by the court of the original instance (a punishment of 10 months, additional collection of 760,000 won) is too unreasonable.
2. The judgment seems to have led to the confession and reflect on the crime.
There are no criminal records of the same kind, and there are little cooperation among narcotics investigation companies, and the wife who must support the family, family, siblings, and booms.
However, it is inevitable to keep the defendant under detention for a considerable period of time.
The number of times for medication and purchase of this case is reasonable.
The reaction of training of philophones has been made in the hair.
There are several criminal records and repeated crimes.
The court of the court below rendered the sentence against the defendant by taking account of the aforementioned various positive and negative circumstances.
The judgment below
There is no new circumstance that can be considered in sentencing as a result of the sentence.
In addition, in full view of various sentencing conditions under Article 51 of the Criminal Act, such as the Defendant’s age, sex, environment, motive, means, and consequence of the commission of the crime, the circumstances before and after the commission of the crime, the lower court’s sentence is not deemed unfair.
3. Thus, the defendant's appeal is not reasonable, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act.
The proviso of Article 186 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act shall apply to litigation costs.