도로교통법위반(음주운전)
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
1. The sentencing of the lower court (eight months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable as the gist of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable.
2. The Defendant committed the instant crime even though he/she was sentenced to a suspended sentence of imprisonment due to a crime of drinking alcohol in 2010 and 2013, and was sentenced to a fine in around 2014 after he/she committed the instant crime during the suspended sentence.
The alcohol concentration in blood at the time of driving the instant drinking exceeds 0.1%.
In full view of the various circumstances, including the above circumstances, including the Defendant’s age, sex, environment, family relationship, motive, background, means and consequence of the crime, and the circumstances after the crime, and there are no special circumstances or changes in circumstances that make it possible to change the sentencing of the lower court after the judgment, the sentencing of the lower court is not unfair.
3. The Defendant’s appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, on the grounds that the appeal is groundless.