When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

At around 01:20 on December 20, 2017, the Defendant: (a) had expressed the desire of the victim D(50 years) and the cargo exhaust; (b) had expressed the victim’s “chrone” in the victim’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son on treatment

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of suspects of D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the victim D's upper part photograph, A's upper part photograph, and A's upper part photograph;

1. Article 257 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act provides for the following factors: (a) degree of injury to the reason for sentencing; (b) motive for the crime; (c) the Defendant agreed as soon as possible with the victim; (d) the Defendant was assaulted by the victim of India (the victim did not have been punished); (c) the records of the violent fine were four times; (d) there was no history of punishment after 2012; and (e) there was no history of punishment after