When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On November 21, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with labor for a violation of the Specialized Credit Financial Business Act at the Seoul Eastern District Court on January 30, 2015, and was finally decided on January 30, 2015, and is in a credit relationship with the victim C.

On March 27, 2014, around 15:00 on March 27, 2014, the Defendant appears to have “lease” as stated in the leased indictment at the store D and E warehouse event. Thus, the Defendant shall correct ex officio.

In doing so, the door of the above warehouse, which is operating, interfered with the affairs such as preventing the transportation of goods necessary for the locked event site by locks.

Summary of Evidence

1. Court statement of the defendant (the second trial date);

1. Each police statement concerning C and F;

1. A real estate lease contract;

1. On-site photographs;

1. Previous convictions in holding: To apply the Konet case search outputs and the application of each of the written judgments to statutes;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. The latter part of Article 37 and Article 39 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning concurrent crimes;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;