손해배상(기)
1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the Defendants exceeding the following amount ordered to be paid shall be revoked.
1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, citing the instant case, is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the following cases, and thus, it shall be cited including the attached form and summary form pursuant to the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.
In Part 5 of the judgment of the first instance, “the remuneration sum table by list” is added to “(the unit of the amount indicated in the defect repair expense list, including the above sum table, is referred to as “the source”)”, and the 13th “the sum table by the defect list” is added to “the remuneration expense sum table by list”.
“127,943,119” is “13,486” as “13,489,886 of the 4-year defect repair cost for the section for common use indicated in the 6th judgment of the first instance. “130,210,107” is “15,756,874”; “1,315,031,206” is “1,30,577,973”; “2,367,909,646” is “2,353,456” from “2,353,456,413 of the 4-year defect repair cost for the section for common use and the section for common use; “130,210,107” is also “15,210,874 of the 4-year defect repair cost for the section for common use and the section for common use; “3485,7844 of the 3-year defect repair cost for each of the 4th judgment on the 5th and annexed underground parking lot.
6. Dismissal of the first instance judgment
(d) “B” 24,579.6869 of the area of the section for exclusive use by the second assignment household listed in the 2nd assignment household’s Schedule (“24,579.69”).
"Class 7 of the first instance court and the second instance court" as a result of the court's request for each expert witness to supplement the expert witness.