Of the facts charged in the instant case, fraud against the victim C, D, E, F, G, H, I, and J.

around July 19, 2013, the Defendant would produce Al crime, posters or liquid photographs to 200,000 won per person, 5R straw photographs, 1 copy, etc. to the victim M, etc., and produce them to 100,000,000 won if the Defendant wishes to produce DVD production, and send the production cost to the victim M, etc., i.e., the order for the crime, photograph, DVD, etc. that was promised after the date of graduation at the GV meeting of the graduate.

“A false representation was made.”

However, at the time of fact, the defendant had no intention or ability to produce Al crime, photograph, DV, etc. within the due date, even if he receives the production cost from the victims in advance, because it is difficult for the defendant to use the money from the victims for the purpose of the Switzerland rent, vehicle purchase cost, car camera purchase cost, employee salary, insurance premium, etc.

The defendant is against the victim M in the same year.

8. From April 16, 2013 to October 10 of the same year, in addition to the remittance of KRW 200,000,000 as the cost of production of a crime, one shall receive a total of KRW 70,160,00 from the victim 349 in the same manner, such as the statement in the list of crimes in the attached Form from around April 16, 2013.

Summary of Evidence

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of the accused by the prosecution;

1. Each legal statement of C, N,O, and P;

1. The witness Q and R respective legal statements in the third trial records;

1. The legal statement of S in the fourth public trial protocol;

1. T legal statement among the five-time trial records;

1. Each police statement concerning U, J and V;

1. Current status of each damaged university which has been submitted twice by the person under consideration;

1. Details of transactions with W corporation accounts;

1. Application of each statute on filing of a complaint;

1. Relevant Article 347 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. The sentencing of Article 37 (former part), Article 38 (1) 2, and Article 50 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment of Concurrent Crimes appears to be a crime based on dolusible intentional negligence, and both Switzerland and graduate-based photographs, which are the important parts of the supply contract for the graduation of this case, have been performed, and the photograph and video files have been taken.