If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

No person shall use a trademark identical with the registered trademark of another person on goods similar to the designated goods, or use a trademark similar to the registered trademark on goods identical with or similar to the designated goods

피고인은 2013. 1. 6. 17:40경 서울 중구 B 앞 노상에서, 등록상표인 까르띠에, 프라다, 에르메스, 불가리, 크리스챤디올, 루이비통, 샤넬과 동일한 타인의 상표를 별지 범죄일람표 기재와 같이 총 139점을 무단으로 사용하여 판매 또는 판매할 목적으로 보관, 소지하였다.

Accordingly, the defendant violated his authority by using the above trademark rights and exclusive trademark rights.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Suppression photographs;

1. Records of seizure and the list of seizure;

1. Application of the statutes of the original trademark register;

1. Article 93 of the relevant Act concerning criminal facts and Article 93 of the Trademark Act regarding the selection of fines;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 97-2 (1) of the Trademark Act that is confiscated;