물품대금
1. The Defendants shall jointly and severally serve as the Plaintiff KRW 23,648,661 as well as as the period from May 11, 2006 to September 30, 2015.
1. Request indicating the claim, for an extension of the extinctive prescription of the claim based on a ruling recommending a compromise in the case of Seoul Eastern District Court 2006Kadan1757; and
2. Judgment without holding any pleadings (Article 208 (3) 1 of the Civil Procedure Act);
3. Part of the term "Plaintiff" claimed damages for delay on May 10, 2006 against KRW 23,648,661, but according to the evidence No. 1-1 (Seoul Eastern District Court Decision 2006Kadan1757 decided to recommend settlement in the case No. 2006Gadan177), the claim against the above damages for delay is groundless, and the above damages for delay is dismissed.