beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 2015.05.14 2015고단992

사기

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, as a proposal for a false lease contract, concluded that the lessee of a false lease contract play the role of the nominal owner of the loan, and concluded that the Defendant applied for the loan of the employee deposit money in the name of the Defendant, along with the brokers of the above loan, and divided the loans that received.

Accordingly, on December 2013, the Defendant, along with the above name brokers, prepared a false lease contract (EF, lessee: G apartment 109 Dong 101, 150,000 won: 150,000 won: 2 years) from the “D Licensed Real Estate Agent Office” located in Chungcheongnam-si, Chungcheongnam-si, Chungcheongnam-si, and the false lease contract (lease E: lessee, lessee: 109 Dong apartment 100,000,000 won: 150,000 won: 2 years), and around that time, the Defendant was found to have worked as a worker in H, with the false employment certificate, payment statement, income tax confirmation certificate, etc. issued under the above H’s name.

After that, on December 2013, the Defendant submitted an application for a loan of KRW 80,000,000 to the employees in charge of the loan of KRW 80,00,00,00 to the Seoul High Sea Branch Office, which is the victim in Jinjin-si, Eup-dong 489-2, Jungjin-si, Seoul. In addition, the Defendant submitted an application for a loan of KRW 489,00,000 to the employees in charge of the loan of KRW 80,00,

However, the Defendant did not work as an employee in the above H, and did not intend to lease the loan from E as a whole or to use the loan as a deposit.

Accordingly, the Defendant, in collusion with the above name Brokers, went through an employee under the name in the name of the party branch in the Jinhae Sea of the Victim Bank, and then took over KRW 80 million from the victim to the company bank account in the name of E in the name of E in December 19, 2013 from the victim, with the transfer of KRW 80,000,000 from the name of the employee in the name

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's statement in court;