beta
(영문) 전주지방법원 군산지원 2014.10.10 2014고합147

주민등록법위반등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On June 4, 2014, the Defendant, on June 6, 2014, sentenced D’s children elected as Do Council members at the 6th local election district of a metropolitan election district, and led to his mind to cast his vote in order to move his residence to the said constituency and to help D’s success.

On March 3, 2014, at the office of the Korea Airports Corporation, the defendant's workplace located in Jung-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, Jung-gu, 2850, connected to the "Government Civil Petitions 24" by means of a computer at the office of the E Team office of the Korea Airports Corporation, which is the defendant's workplace, the defendant, at the time of 2850 P.m., entered the name and resident registration number, entered the resident registration number into an authorized certificate, and made a move-in report by entering

As a result, the Defendant filed a false report on a resident registration for the purpose of casting a vote in a specific election district, and filed a false report on a resident registration.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Investigations into communications confirmation data, resident registration abstracts, and application of statutes to the list of elected persons;

1. Article 247 (1) of the Public Official Election Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense ( false report on resident registration for a specific election district) and subparagraph 3 of Article 37 of the Resident Registration Act;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes (Punishment on a violation of the Resident Registration Act heavier than the punishment);

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The crime of this case where the reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act (unapplicable of the sentencing criteria) of the provisional payment order is no crime for which the defendant has set the sentencing guidelines, was reported falsely to the father D, who moved in the sixth provincial election district (Celection district) for the purpose of casting a vote, and thus is contrary to the purpose of the Resident Registration Act, which disturbs election order and disturbs the purpose of the Resident Registration Act, or the defendant recognized the crime of this case, and the defendant was sentenced to a fine once due to the violation of the Act on Special Cases Concerning