교통사고처리특례법위반등
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
1. In light of the following: (a) the gist of the grounds for appeal is the Defendant’s confession and reflects in depth; (b) the Defendant is in a position to support his wife and knee and knee, etc.; and (c) the Defendant’s disuse and collection without good health conditions; and (d) the Defendant’s livelihood is being maintained by discontinuance and collection, such as kneeing, etc., the sentence imposed by the lower court is too unreasonable.
2. Although there are such circumstances as alleged by the defendant, the crime of this case was committed under the influence of 0.101% of blood alcohol concentration, and the defendant was charged with 3 weeks or 2 weeks of injury caused to 5 persons such as the injured party D, etc. by shocking the central line while driving the cargo while under the influence of alcohol concentration of 0.10%, and due to that, the defendant suffered from 3 weeks or 2 weeks of injury caused to 5 persons such as the injured party D, etc., and the drinking driving is not easy. It is necessary to strictly eradicate it by reflecting the revision of the Road Traffic Act and the purpose of the Road Traffic Act as an act that may cause damage that may cause damage that may not be harming the lives and property of individuals as well as the injured party. The victims still want to be punished against the defendant because the defendant did not reach the agreement with the injured party, and the defendant's violation of the Road Traffic Act alone does not constitute a fine of 3 million won or more, and the defendant's criminal records, character and environment, the circumstances and result of the crime of this case, etc.
3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.