[2] On December 19, 2006, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 2,00,000 as a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act (dacting driving) at the Goyang Branch of the Jung-gu District Court on December 19, 2006. On September 4, 2017, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 4,00,000 as a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act (dacting driving), and on June 14, 2018, the Defendant was indicted for non-detained as a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act (dacting driving) at the Goyang Branch of the District Court of the Jung-gu District Court on August 30, 2018, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on September 7, 2018 after being sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years on September 7, 2018.

[2] On August 27, 2018, the Defendant driven a CPoter-II truck owned by B, while under the influence of alcohol by 0.129% while under the influence of alcohol, from around 100 meters to around 992, from the Sinju-si Sin-si Sin-si, Geumju-ri-si, Geumju-si, Pri-si, Pari-si, Pari-si, Pari-si, Pari-si.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement of the circumstances of the driver involved in driving;

1. Inquiry into licenses, chassiss, and mandatory insurance (C);

1. Previous convictions: (A) a response letter, such as inquiry about criminal history, reporting on the results of confirmation of previous convictions and investigation reports (the previous judgment and attachment to indictments), and the application of statutes;

1. Article 148-2 (1) 1, Article 44 (1) (the point of drinking), Article 152 subparagraph 1, and Article 43 of the Traffic Act concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor as a matter of choice of punishment (the defendant was referred to the trial without permission or driving without permission and again committed the instant crime at the time prior to the sentencing date of the said trial. In consideration of such points, the criminal records of the defendant, the criminal records of the same kind of crime, and the blood alcohol concentration in the instant case, the sentence shall be imposed, but the sentence shall be imposed in consideration of equity in cases where the judgment has been rendered together with the case for which a final judgment

1. Subsequent to Article 37 of the Criminal Act dealing with concurrent crimes: Provided, That Article 39 (1) shall apply;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act to mitigate small amount;