소유권이전등록
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
1. The plaintiff's assertion that around June 2002, the plaintiff requested the sale of a motor vehicle listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter "the motor vehicle of this case") through the non-party, and transferred the motor vehicle of this case along with the documents necessary for the transfer of the motor vehicle. Since the defendant purchased the motor vehicle of this case on June 15, 2003 but did not transfer the registration name, the defendant is obligated to take over the transfer registration procedure based on the transfer agreement from the plaintiff.
2. We examine the judgment, and the fact that the defendant subscribed to and operated the automobile insurance of this case from September 3, 2002 to September 3, 2003 is not a dispute between the parties. However, the fact that the above recognition alone is insufficient to recognize that the defendant purchased the automobile of this case from the plaintiff through the name-free box, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it. Thus, the plaintiff's above assertion is without merit.
3. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.