A. Facts of recognition 1) D is a bus E around 19:15 on August 14, 2014 (hereinafter “Defendant vehicle”).

A) A driver of the vehicle had a duty of care to check whether there is a person who drives the vehicle, and to safely drive the vehicle according to the traffic signal and prevent the accident in advance. Nevertheless, D neglected the traffic signal while driving the vehicle, and caused a shock to the right side of the vehicle of the Defendant, the driver of the vehicle, who has been crossinged by the pedestrian crossing in accordance with the pedestrian signals, by negligent negligence continuing to stop the signal while driving the vehicle, led A to a shockion in front of the right side of the vehicle of the Defendant. Ultimately, D caused a serious injury to A, such as an external depression, which requires treatment of about 20 weeks or more by occupational negligence (hereinafter referred to as the “accident of this case”).

(2) As indicated in the instant accident scene map, D recognized all the circumstances leading up to the instant accident during the criminal trial, and was sentenced to a suspended sentence on January 21, 2015, and the said judgment became final and conclusive as it is. (2) However, A died due to the aftermath of the instant accident on April 15, 2015 while the instant lawsuit was pending.

(A) The Plaintiff C is the deceased’s spouse, and the Plaintiff B is the only child of the deceased. (4) The Defendant C is the operator who owns the Defendant’s vehicle, and the Defendant D is the person employed by the Defendant Thai Korea Co., Ltd. and driven the Defendant vehicle at the time of the instant accident. The Federation of the Defendant National Bus Transport Business Association is the person who entered into a bus mutual aid agreement with respect to the Defendant vehicle.

(hereinafter referred to as “the defendants”). [No dispute exists over the grounds for recognition.]