Seized evidence No. 1 (Mesphere) shall be forfeited from the accused.

1. The Defendant is not a person handling narcotics, etc.

On November 2, 2014, at around 18:30, the Defendant administered DNA 602, which is a psychotropic drug, in a single-use injection machine, and administered approximately 0.03g of psychotropic drugs, by inserting them into a single-use injection machine, and then injection into a double-use drug.

B. On November 2, 2014, around 19:25, the Defendant carried approximately 0.43 g of philopon by inserting it to the hand room from 602.

2. The Defendant is not a person handling narcotics. A. The Defendant is not a person handling narcotics.

On July 21, 2014, the Defendant administered approximately 0.03g of philophones, which are psychotropic drugs, in a single-use entertainment machine, and in a way that the Defendant injecteds to the right arms of the next right arms, at the Fmoto room located in Changwon-si E, Changwon-si.

B. On August 2014, the Defendant administered approximately 0.03g of philophones in the same place as at the beginning point 21:00, and in the same manner at the same time as at the beginning point 21:00.

Summary of Evidence

[2014 Highest 3034]

1. Statement of the accused in the first protocol of trial;

1. Police seizure records;

1. Investigation report (measurement of weight of philopon carried by a suspect and report on the market price of Mepopon);

1. Each written appraisal [2015 Height282]

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police seizure records;

1. A report on investigation (calculated additional charges);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to written appraisal;

1. Article 60 (1) 2, Article 4 (1) 1, and subparagraph 3 (b) of Article 2 of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, etc. under Relevant Acts concerning criminal facts (the occupation of medication and possession of phiphones, and the choice of imprisonment);

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37 and Article 38 (1) 2 of the Criminal Act;

1. The main sentence of Article 67 of the Act on the Management of Confiscated Narcotics;

1. The proviso to Article 67 of the Narcotics Control Act;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order is that the defendant has been punished for the same crime several times, and that the amount of penphones possessed by the defendant is not small: Provided, That the defendant is recognized to commit the crime of this case, and other defendants are accused.