마약류관리에관한법률위반(향정)
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is that the punishment prescribed by the court of the original instance (a year and six months of imprisonment, an additional collection of KRW 600,000) is too unreasonable.
2. The judgment seems to have led to the confession and reflect on the crime.
The health of people is not good, and the people appeal the ship's wife.
However, the criminal liability of the defendant is not against the law.
There are a number of criminal records, and the same criminal records are eight times, and allhh crimes are committed again even after being punished, and this case is the same repeated crime.
The court of the court below rendered the sentence against the defendant by taking account of the aforementioned various positive and negative circumstances.
The judgment below
There is no new circumstance that can be considered in sentencing as a result of the sentence.
In addition, in full view of various sentencing conditions stipulated in Article 51 of the Criminal Act, such as the Defendant’s age, sex, environment, motive, means, and consequence of the commission of the crime, the circumstances before and after the commission of the crime, the lower court’s sentence is not deemed unfair.
3. As such, the Defendant’s appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the appeal is without merit.
The proviso of Article 186 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act shall apply to litigation costs.