2. There are extenuating circumstances, such as the Defendant’s confession and confession of each of the instant crimes, the Defendant’s health is not good, and the Defendant’s submission of a written application to the effect that police officers E would take the Defendant’s seat in the trial.

However, the crime of interference with the performance of official duties needs to be strictly punished in order to resolve a rumor that indicates a legitimate public authority and establish a legal order. The crime of violation of the Game Industry Promotion Act also requires strict punishment in light of the seriousness of the social malicious and harmful consequences, such as encouraging the general public to commit an excessive speculative spirit and undermining the will to work, etc. The defendant has been punished three times the suspension of execution due to interference with the performance of official duties, the crime of violation of the Game Industry Promotion Act, which has been punished once again, and other various circumstances, which are the conditions for sentencing as shown in the instant records and the theory of changes, such as the defendant's age, sex, sex, environment, family relationship, means and consequence of the crime, etc., are considered, and the punishment imposed by the court below is too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit.