채무부존재확인
1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.
Purport of claim and appeal
1..
1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as follows, and this case is cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, since the reasoning of the court of first instance is the same as that of the court of first instance, except where the case is used or added as follows:
[Supplementary or added parts] Part 2, part 13 of Part 2, "No. 5, 2008" was added to "No. 4, 2010."
Part 2, "1,468,871 won" in Part 15 shall be added to "1,467,871 won".
Part 2, "three million won" in Part 17 shall be added to "two million won".
Part 4, Paragraph 3, “A” is added to “I” (in particular, according to the statement of the evidence No. 2-3 in the case of a geneology disease, the Plaintiff indicated that his father was suffering from urology in the process of visiting and confirming the health of the patient on May 15, 2007, after entering into the 1 and 2 insurance policy, while indicating that his father was suffering from urology in the process of confirming the health of the patient.”
Part 4, Part 14 "D" shall be added to "E".
In Part 4, "whether or not," is added to "after deducting the amount necessary for guaranteeing risks from the paid-in premiums, and whether or not the fact that indirect investment is made in the fund and the fact that the cancellation refund may require a long period of time in order to reach the principal."
Part 5, conduct 2, after addition to the following:
In regard to this, the defendant asserts that he did not sign the application form and the product description of each of the insurance contracts of this case, and only signed the blank document brought by B at the time of conclusion of the insurance contract. However, there is no evidence to acknowledge it (In conclusion, according to the results of the written appraisal by the court appraiser F of the first instance trial on the above subscription form and the product description, it is recognized that there is no special reason to view that the defendant forged the defendant's signature by means of printing out the form such as the subscription form after receiving the signature first in blank, etc.). The above argument by the defendant is without merit
2. Conclusion.