When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On May 15, 2016, the Defendant entered the house by shouldering the glass windows equivalent to 40,000 won at the market price of the entrance and removing the correction device, on the ground that the victim living together with the Defendant was not in contact at around 15:0,00, and entered the house, and then, “Trisung” TV equivalent to 250,000 won at the market price of the victim’s possession inside the house, whether the market price is at least 180,000 won at the market price, or at least 35,30,000 won at the market price, and has been 150,000 won at the market price, and has been 0,000 won at the 0,000,000 won at the market price, 150,000,000 won at the 0,50,000,000 won at the market price at the 0,000,000 won at the market price.

Accordingly, the Defendant infringed upon the victim’s residence, damaged the victim’s property, and stolen the victim’s property.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each written statement of D;

1. A report on investigation;

1. Application of related Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 319(1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, Article 319(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 366 of the Criminal Act, Article 329 of the Criminal Act, Article 329 of the Criminal Act, and the choice of fines;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The grounds for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act for sentencing order under Article 334(1) include: (a) the confession of all of the instant crimes; (b) the submission of an agreement to the effect that the victim directly agreed with the Defendant to this court; and (c) the Defendant issues a summary order of KRW 1 million as a result of interference with business on December 4,