2. However, for two years from the date this judgment has become final and conclusive.

Defendant

A is a person operating a game room with no trade name of approximately 256 square meters in the first floor of Yongsan-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and Defendant B received daily allowances from the above A and where the game room is controlled, he/she is a person who is under investigation as if he/she is the actual operator of the entertainment room.

Defendant

C is an employee working in the above entertainment room.

1. Defendants A and B conspired with each other from July 6, 2012 to September of the same month, installed 52 personal computers and monitoring 52 computers in the said game room, and provided them for use by customers who did not receive any rating on the said computer, and exchanged intangible results obtained by customers through the use of game products by changing the scores obtained by customers using the game products in cash.

2. Defendant C worked as an employee of the above game site on condition that the daily allowances are paid from the above A and B at the above time, and the scores obtained by customers using game products are replaced in cash, and Defendant C, like Defendant A and B, such as employing the employees to work in the above game site, and making customers feel in good faith, aided and abetted the provision of game products not classified in the above game site and exchange of game results.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant A and C’s respective legal statements, Defendant B’s partial legal statements

1. Each legal statement of a witness A, H and C;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on seizure records;

1. Article 44 (1) 2, Article 32 (1) 1 and 7 of the Game Industry Promotion Act, and Article 30 of the Criminal Act: Defendant C: Article 44 (1) 2, Article 32 (1) 1 and 7 of the Game Industry Promotion Act, Article 32 of the Criminal Act, Article 32 of the Criminal Act;

1. Aggravation for concurrent crimes;