2. As to the Defendant’s assertion of the same purport as the grounds for appeal, the lower court held that the victim received a part of the Defendant’s flabing with his head, flabing him in a relatively consistent manner in the investigative agency and the lower court.

Specifically stated, at that time, at that time;

D In full view of the fact that the Defendant and the victim stated in the court of the court below that fighting began, the Defendant and the victim did assaulted the victim in the process of fighting the body of the Defendant and the victim at the time of the instant case.

In light of the foregoing, it is rejected and found guilty of the facts charged in this case.

Examining the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below in light of the records, the above determination by the court below is just and acceptable, and there is an error of law that affected the conclusion of the judgment by misunderstanding the facts.

It does not seem that it does not appear.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.