Text

The judgment of the first instance court is modified as follows upon the request of the plaintiff changed in the trial court.

Reasons

1. On March 10, 2012, (1) the Plaintiff’s birth, E and the Defendant made an oral agreement on the same business (hereinafter “instant agreement”) with the Plaintiff, stating that “D” is to be operated along with the two commercial buildings on the ground C (hereinafter “instant commercial building”); the name of the business operator is the Defendant; the lease deposit, facility cost, etc. shall be borne by 1/2; and the operating profit is to be apportioned one half (hereinafter “the instant agreement”); the Plaintiff’s assertion that it had continued to be in the same business relationship with the Defendant from the first instance court to September 14, 2020; (2) the Plaintiff appears to have made a lease agreement with the Plaintiff on its own behalf of the Plaintiff and the lessee on its own (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 200Da1700, Mar. 14, 201).