해고무효확인
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
1. The plaintiff's assertion of the parties is a worker employed by the defendant, his body and body were examined by the defendant due to poor working environment, rapid heart booming, chest pain, etc., and work was done on June 22, 2017, and it is difficult to help the defendant to appeal and treat the plaintiff before commencing night work on June 22, 2017. The defendant's manager et al. was in a lodging place where he was staying in order to report to the police station after receiving hospital treatment by stating that the plaintiff was dismissed without permission. The plaintiff was dismissed from the defendant's office on June 22, 2017. The confirmation that the dismissal was null and void and the payment of wages during the pertinent dismissal period is sought.
In this regard, the defendant did not dismiss the plaintiff.
2. The Plaintiff’s assertion based on the premise that the Defendant was dismissed on June 22, 2017, is insufficient to acknowledge that the Defendant dismissed the Plaintiff on the sole basis of the statement or voice of evidence Nos. 1 and 5, and there is no objective evidence to acknowledge otherwise. Thus, the Plaintiff’s assertion based on the premise that the Defendant was dismissed is not acceptable without further determination.
3. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.