농수산물의원산지표시에관한법률위반
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
1. In light of the circumstances that may be considered in light of the background leading up to the instant crime, etc., the sentence imposed by the lower court (two million won of fine) is too unreasonable.
2. Taking into account the circumstances alleged by the Defendant, the instant crime was committed by the Defendant as a cleaning agent, and the Defendant provided Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese gymba, and entered the country of origin in the domestic origin on the mark of origin in the business place while making a false statement of origin at the time of sale. Such an act is an offense impeding the sound distribution order of agricultural products and undermining the consumer confidence, and requires strict punishment. Korean gymbachi in Korea, which is sold or kept for sale, was committed for a prolonged period of about five months on the basis of approximately 200 km, and the instant crime was committed for a large amount of five months. In full view of all the circumstances, such as the character, conduct and environment of the Defendant, the background and consequence of each of the instant crimes, circumstances after the instant crimes, etc., the Defendant’s above assertion cannot be deemed unfair since the sentence imposed by the lower court is unreasonable.
3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.