(a) Defendant B is entitled to 52/520 shares, b.

A. N was married with theO and born the Plaintiff, P, and Q in South Korea. On May 22, 1975, N was born but did not have a transplant.

B. N has died in 1982, R in 1995, P in 1996, and R’s sibling in 1996, and there is net S, net T, and net U.

(c) the inheritance relationship between the network N and the network shall be as shown in the list of changes in the inheritance shares listed in the separate sheet;

The Plaintiff filed a separate suit as the court No. 2017da6071 against V and W, but withdrawn it.

【Fact that does not have any dispute】

2. Judgment on the ground of the Plaintiff’s claim

(a) Indication of claims: To be as shown in the reasons for the claims;

B. For Defendant F or L: Judgment by service of public notice

C. As to Defendant C, D, E, G, H, I, J, and K: Non- pleadings judgment

D. According to the statements in Gap evidence Nos. 4 and 6 and witness X testimony against defendant B, it is recognized that the deceased R received and waived the portion of inheritance on real estate in the attached list following N's death in 1988 from the plaintiff, and agreed to transfer it to the plaintiff.

As to this, Defendant B asserted that the receipt (Evidence A 5) date is not written, and that it is a false document written on behalf of the Plaintiff. However, according to the above evidence, the phrase of the receipt is recognized as having been replaced by X, which is the Plaintiff’s senior career relationship, but there is no ground to acknowledge that it was false or forged.

3. If so, the plaintiff's claim against the defendants is reasonable, and it is so decided as per Disposition.