except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The Defendant is a person engaging in driving service of B B non-S106 buses.

On May 1, 2013, the Defendant, around 12:33, driven the front road of the 570 upper school of Seocheon-si, Seocheon-si, Seocheon-si, 12:33, along the two-lanes of the two-lanes of the two-lanes of the two-lanes of the two-lanes of the two-lanes of the upper school

However, there is a signal apparatus and crosswalk installed so in such a case, there was a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by safely checking whether a person engaged in driving a motor vehicle has a duty of care, by complying with the signal and by safely checking whether a person engaged in driving a motor vehicle has a right-to-face, and by safely checking whether he/she is a person who

Nevertheless, even though the Defendant neglected this and failed to enter the crosswalk, he did not find out C(9) with the above crosswalk depending on the walk signals and did not get the victim to go beyond the floor.

As a result, the Defendant caused the victim to suffer injury, such as an injury to the victim, such as a closed frame, which requires approximately eight weeks of medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. On-site survey reports, field photographs, etc., and capturing booms and video images of the skin vehicle;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Article 3 (1), the proviso to Article 3 (2) 1 and 6 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents concerning Criminal Facts, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, and the selection of imprisonment without prison labor;

1. Suspension of execution under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (General circumstances, such as the confession of and reflect on the crime in this case, the agreement with the injured party, and the primary charge);