2. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. The plaintiffs' assertion 1) The defendant and D concluded a medical contract with the medical personnel of the defendant hospital for treatment of the two kinds of brain ties, but the medical personnel of the defendant hospital failed to perform this properly. Due to such nonperformance, the defendant hospital suffered brain cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral d and the plaintiffs. Therefore, the defendant shall compensate the plaintiffs for damages caused by the above nonperformance. 2) The medical obligation owed to the patients by the doctor to determine the patient is not the obligation that must be achieved as a result of the patient's recovery, but rather the obligation that must be performed necessary and appropriate measures in light of the current medical level with the duty of due care as a good manager, and therefore, it cannot be presumed that the non-performance of the obligation to treat is an obligation without delay with the result of the medical treatment.

(See Supreme Court Decision 85Meu1491 delivered on December 13, 198). According to the facts acknowledged in Paragraph (1) above, the medical personnel at Defendant Hospital performed the instant procedure to perform co-chronological surgery on two brain beer, but only one of them completed co-chronsis and tried to perform cerebral beer in the cerebral beer, and completed the instant procedure without being left in the cerebral beer, the medical personnel at Defendant Hospital’s hospital’s failure to perform the instant procedure cannot be presumed with the outcome of such medical examination.

Therefore, the plaintiffs' above assertion is without merit.

B. The brain beer of D’s assertion 15% of negligence in the instant procedure is a wide beer in which the success rate of co-chronchis is not more than 15%.