However, from the date of the final judgment of this case, the defendants are above two years from the date of the final judgment.

1. No one who commits a joint crime by Defendant A and Defendant B shall destroy, destroy, modify, forge, or interrupt an information and communications system, data, program, or similar without justifiable grounds, nor shall he/she convey or spread a program that is likely to interfere with its operation (hereinafter “malicious program”) and shall not intrude into an information and communications network without legitimate access or beyond permitted access authority.

The name-free persons: (a) developed and run the program “surves” (hereinafter “surves program”) to see the other party’s computer screen in the nationwide PC room; (b) installed the program in the nationwide PC room through a competitor of the PC maintenance and management company; and (c) granted the nationwide “scambs” operators through the “stegs”, “C, D, E, etc., and granted the right to use the interview program by receiving daily user fees; and (d) the “b” operators of F, etc., etc., along with Defendant A, Defendant B, etc., engaged in the Internet surbs and Baduk games, etc. on a computer in which an unspecified number of users of the PC room are installed; and (d) opened the Internet surbs and Baduk games, etc. through the above interview program in order to acquire the game by easily reporting the screen from other computers.

According to the above conspiracys, the Defendants: F installed 20 computers at the office located in G 2 from February 1, 2016 to February 8, 2016, and received an interview program by paying the user fee to C, etc.; Defendant A used an interview program that steals stolen the other party’s plaque as “the player” from February 3, 2016 to February 29, 2016, and Defendant B used.