When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The Defendant is well-known by the Defendant, and C was commissioned to collect the loan claims against the wife E (the age of 56) of the Victim E from the two-way persons, and G is the mother of G, and H is the female employee of G. G is the female employee of the high school. The pressure to repay the debt to the above F is difficult to determine that it is difficult to receive the loan claims solely due to the pressure on repayment of the debt to the above F, and the victim has committed the following crimes in the course of pressureing the victim to repay the above loan claims on behalf of the above F as the assistant principal of the current high school.

1. Joint conduct with the accused's C, G, and H;

A. On April 3, 2012, the Defendant violated the Fair Collection of Claims Act, in collusion with C, G, and H, and as a part of demanding the Defendant to repay the loan claims to the victim on behalf of F on April 15, 2012, the Defendant severely harmed the victim’s privacy or peace in business by repeatedly demanding the victim, who is not legally obligated to repay the debt on behalf of F on behalf of the obligee by means of visit to the above school, interview with the principal, interview with the principal, demonstration, etc. from May 30, 2012, including demanding the victim’s mobile phone number by finding out the J High School located in J High School I in office as an assistant principal, and demanding the victim’s mobile phone number with respect to the loan claims against F. < Amended by Act No. 11488, May 30, 2012>

B. The Defendant, in collusion with defamation C, G, and H on April 18, 2012, found in the school room of the above J High School, and interviewed with K, the principal. The Defendant stated that “the victim’s children are in a stable life, such as studying abroad and going through golf even if the wife of the victim borrowed money and did not repay the borrowed money, and they are in bad faith as assistant principal,” and that “the victim’s children are in a stable life, such as sending out study abroad and going through golf.” As such, the Defendant’s reputation by openly pointing out facts, including impairing the victim’s reputation from that time on May 30, 2012.